Signed in as

Death of the SEO Copywriters - Spam Detection with Phrase Based Information Retrieval

Bill Slawski of SEObytheSea has a great post up explaining a concept of how search engines (Google, man!) do a phrase based analysis – of your content to assign quality measures to it and possibly put it into the wastebasket or at least supplemental index.

The idea is that quality documents have a different co-occurrence of certain phrases (“money-words”) than spammy or low quality articles you bought for two dollars each from that low-quality writer in India recently who wasn’t even aware of how to use Word properly, not to speak about creating quality content…

Certainly a “SEOed” article around a phrase, let’s say “President of the united states” would use that term in all variations, word order and such.

A quality article really talking about the President of the united states would probably mention other “unimportant” things like names of past presidents, non-important things like amorous adventures, hollywood careers or other generally bad habits of those big guys that nobody would place an Adwords bid on for example.

The search engines just create a co-occurance matrix for all phrases in the document and match those statistics against other quality documents.

patent,bill wrote:

From the foregoing, the number of the related phrases present in a given document will be known. A normal, non-spam document will generally have a relatively limited number of related phrases, typically on the order of between 8 and 20, depending on the document collection. By contrast, a spam document will have an excessive number of related phrases, for example on the order of between 100 and 1000 related phrases. Thus, the present invention takes advantage of this discovery by identifying as spam documents those documents that have a statistically significant deviation in the number of related phrases relative to an expected number of related phrases for documents in the document collection.

So short – that patent and the wonderful clear exlpanation by Bill outlines pretty well, that Google & co DO have the means and technology to judge on content quality …

and that is the death for all SEO “copywriters” just focussing on keyword density, repetition and keyword stuffing.

What does that mean for you if you HIRE a writer for creating content?

DO NOT overdo your specifications concerning keyword phrases to use!

Especially in the last months I have seen content rank GREAT on Google (if on the right domains) for related phrases versus phrases that were really used in the content… you don’t need to have an exact mention of a keyword phrase for it to be found on Google anymore!

NO, it could even harm you nowadays – that’s the next phase of overoptimization penalties – create good, natural content and RANK!

Average rating
(0 votes)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.marketingfan.com/trackback/1217

Comments

Only death of poor copywriters

SEO has been a pendulum of links vs content for quite some time now, so in the grand scheme of things, I really only see this as movement. I always look forward to these changes, because it removes the lesser competition that focus on simple tactics, and those that don't adapt.

That said, I have my doubts as to whether SEO copywriting will disappear; if anything, it will become more of a necessity -- the ability to clearly articulate one's thoughts, whilst being mindful of textual boundaries is hugely important.

With an improved focus on natural SEO writing (as a component of the SEO strategy), adaptive SEOs will succeed.

Marketing Fan's picture

Yeah - I meant poor copywriters ...

Yeah - I agree - I meant the poor copywriters to disappear - those indian content writers that label themselves as being able to provide the right content (rubbish) to feed search engines...

Good content will stick and succeed of course - seoed or not.

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com

We used to write some pretty

We used to write some pretty keyword dense articles, but have really been focusing on quality for the last year. And this won't surprise you... the quality articles work much better. We pay a little more, but in the long run it is well worth it.

Marketing Fan's picture

don't care about keyword density anymore

that's what I'm saying... don't even award a contract to some writers that brag about them being able to fulfill some kind of keyword density... there's no such unimportant and harmful thing as caring about keyword density

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com