<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOFOLLOW CSS Class &#8211; fake or new way to rip of link buyers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordy in Burnaby</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-23481</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordy in Burnaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23481</guid>
		<description>I am not sure &#039;i follow&#039; entirely. Many sites will have a navigation bar with links, which is visible on all pages on the site. Most of my visits come from organic searches that these links reach to, so they are clearly being indexed and ranked on my site.

If Google in ignoring the footer links, I think that is excellent. My website host/developer has a link to themselves there, which I can remove unless I go with custom CSS, which is still a little beyond me.

I think it would be a good idea to be able to make certain links nofollow, though, and I would like to do that with simple CSS if I could... I am trying to find that information...

I was reading that as of 2009, applying lots of nofollow tags will dimish the page rank... Is this true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure &#8216;i follow&#8217; entirely. Many sites will have a navigation bar with links, which is visible on all pages on the site. Most of my visits come from organic searches that these links reach to, so they are clearly being indexed and ranked on my site.</p>
<p>If Google in ignoring the footer links, I think that is excellent. My website host/developer has a link to themselves there, which I can remove unless I go with custom CSS, which is still a little beyond me.</p>
<p>I think it would be a good idea to be able to make certain links nofollow, though, and I would like to do that with simple CSS if I could&#8230; I am trying to find that information&#8230;</p>
<p>I was reading that as of 2009, applying lots of nofollow tags will dimish the page rank&#8230; Is this true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flash designer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-22738</link>
		<dc:creator>flash designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22738</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the replies to this post very useful info
I&#039;m right now in the process of getting links from footers all theme related and wondered how useful this still is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the replies to this post very useful info<br />
I&#8217;m right now in the process of getting links from footers all theme related and wondered how useful this still is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have updated the page to make it clear that this is speculation on my part. That is why I named the blog post &quot;The End of Paid Links is Near&quot; rather than &quot;The End of Paid Links is Here&quot; :)

Essentially, I believe that this is Google&#039;s next-step in their struggle against Paid Links. I also believe that it will be an incredibly effective strategy that cannot be easily defeated without creating your own, trusted link network.

Anyway, thanks for bringing this to light - I would hate that a lot of people think this was a hoax or something. The only reason why I made that picture in the first place was to show how easy it would be for Google to implement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have updated the page to make it clear that this is speculation on my part. That is why I named the blog post &#8220;The End of Paid Links is Near&#8221; rather than &#8220;The End of Paid Links is Here&#8221; <img src='http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Essentially, I believe that this is Google&#8217;s next-step in their struggle against Paid Links. I also believe that it will be an incredibly effective strategy that cannot be easily defeated without creating your own, trusted link network.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for bringing this to light &#8211; I would hate that a lot of people think this was a hoax or something. The only reason why I made that picture in the first place was to show how easy it would be for Google to implement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nBridges Media</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>nBridges Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Google is trying to create a balance as its pretty obvious trying to moderate link selling is not a very smart idea. The problem is, if google starts to cracking down on link selling heavily (by using auotmated methods and ignoring footer and sitewide links), it will surely affect many good pages too, bring down the quality value of the results at lower end.

By the way Nice Blog, I found it from Drupal.org

PS: By the way, that post is just speculation
------------------------
http://nbridges.com - For SEO Consultancy and Optimization</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is trying to create a balance as its pretty obvious trying to moderate link selling is not a very smart idea. The problem is, if google starts to cracking down on link selling heavily (by using auotmated methods and ignoring footer and sitewide links), it will surely affect many good pages too, bring down the quality value of the results at lower end.</p>
<p>By the way Nice Blog, I found it from Drupal.org</p>
<p>PS: By the way, that post is just speculation<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
<a href="http://nbridges.com" rel="nofollow">http://nbridges.com</a> &#8211; For SEO Consultancy and Optimization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/nofollow-css-class-fake-or-new-way-rip-link-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-643</guid>
		<description>ignoring footer and sitewide links is what Google does to a great extend already for about 2 years... I know some work if closely themed, while a lot others are just waste on money/time/resources

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ignoring footer and sitewide links is what Google does to a great extend already for about 2 years&#8230; I know some work if closely themed, while a lot others are just waste on money/time/resources</p>
<p>Christoph C. Cemper<br />
- the <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingfan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

