<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marketingfan.com &#187; hell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingfan.com/tags/hell/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingfan.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Removed Supplemental Index Labels are good for my business</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payperpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplemental index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business">Why Removed Supplemental Index Labels are good for my business</a><br/><br/>By <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com">Marketingfan.com Internet Markting Blog</a></p>
Thanks To Google For Removing the Supplemental Index label]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business">Why Removed Supplemental Index Labels are good for my business</a><br/><br/>By <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com">Marketingfan.com Internet Markting Blog</a></p>
Earlier this week Google has removed the &#8220;supplemental index&#8221; labels from the <span class="caps">SERP</span>s, and as with every major poops from Google the whole <span class="caps">SEO </span>scene freaked out on this! 

<p>Me too &#8211; because I have to thank Google for giving me &#8211; and my clients a new competitive advantage.</p>

<p><b>Why do I thank Google for removing interesting signals?</b></p>

<p>Well, until last week every wannabeo-seo and his mother could see (in the <span class="caps">SERP</span>s, see grandfathered sample below)<br />
if a page had a problem with ranking&#8230; </p>

<p><img src=http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1282/968031873_7e98839066_o.jpg /></p>

<p>There have been huge posts by <a href="http://www.jimboykin.com/damned-to-google-hell-supplemental-results/">Jim</a> , <a href="http://www.seo4fun.com/notes/supplementals.html">Halfdeck</a> and <a href="http://www.seo4fun.com/blog/2007/02/19/why-duplicate-content-causes-supplimental-results.html">Halfdeck again</a> and a lot more on what/why/where supplementals are. Even I posted about <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com/a/45-of-zero-pages-listed-welcome-to-supplemental-hell.php">Supplemental Hell</a> and one <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com/a/buy-blog-posts-get-supplemental.php">PayPerPost link buying penalty</a> bringing pages into the to supplemental index.</p>

<p><b>Today however&#8230;</b></p>

<p>People need to put more effort into detecting if a page has problem due to being in the supplemental index.<br />
That means a certain (large) amount of <span class="caps">SEO</span>s just won&#8217;t be able to do this in their everyday job.</p>

<p>Halfdeck has his own <a href="http://www.seo4fun.com/php/pagerankbot.php">Supplemenal Detector</a> which is a fancy <span class="caps">JAVA </span>application that is in fact a &#8220;pagerank emulator&#8221; &#8211; <s>and all pages below a certain threshold are marked as supplemental.  I encourage you to download this data scraper, and I&#8217;m sure it works nicely &#8211; but haven&#8217;t tried it. </s></p>

<p>After playing with Halfdeck&#8217;s Pagerank emulator I must say that it&#8217;s a great way to simulate how the &#8220;link juice&#8221; flows thru your site and where you are actually wasting precious link juice (i.e. on useless stats pages). Halfdeck even implemented a &#8220;backlink emulator&#8221; where you can judge on the effects of an additional PRx link to any page you like&#8230; pretty cool tool &#8211; it just lacks <span class="caps">TBPR </span>live queries, but I hope he can add that in the next version.</p>

<p>But, in fact I never cared much about the <span class="caps">TOTAL </span>number of supplementals, but always if <strong>a single</strong> page is in supplemental. Why that? </p>

<p>Well, I guess Link Ninja Master Jim Boykin knows why &#8211; it&#8217;s because you don&#8217;t want to get links on pages in the supplemental index because they won&#8217;t get crawled as often.</p>

<p>Jim&#8217;s recent explanation on finding <a href="http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/">if a page is in supplemental</a> pretty well details how to detect if a page is &#8220;healthy&#8221; at all &#8211; i.e. ranks for obscure terms.</p>

<p>If a page does not even rank for an obscure terms on it, you don&#8217;t need a link there.</p>


<p>So you ask again, <b>why is this cool for your business?</b></p>

<p>Because the way to check if a page is worthy to spend time to get a link on it has just become a bit harder. You will need more work, time, effort, unless <b>you automate it</b>. Just as we do here.</p>

<p>And this is the perfect situation to use an &#8220;internal tool&#8221; (as many <span class="caps">SEO</span>s have) as a competitie advantage to get more and better links in a shorter time&#8230; heck &#8211; some link builders might spend another couple clicks on each page to find out if it qualifies for hunting for link. </p>

<p>We Don&#8217;t <img src='http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>In fact we already see the &#8220;Supplemental Index&#8221; on top of our brower toolbar bar when we visit a page.<br />
In fact we already see the &#8220;Supplemental Index&#8221; label as it used to be printed for <span class="caps">ALL </span>google users in the past, nicely embedded in the <span class="caps">SERP</span>s.</p>

<p>And in fact Google has bought itself now 10-20 more Google queries per <span class="caps">SERP </span>page my Link Arbeiter team screens when looking for links &#8211; plus we are inflating the pageloads of all those sites we screen by one&#8230;</p>

<p>Do you think that hurts Google? Nah &#8211; enough resources.<br />
Do you think it hurts me? Nah &#8211; just got a bunch more proxy IPs to make up for the bigger Google scraping load. </p>

<p>Do you think it will hurt the <span class="caps">SEO </span>scene building links? Well &#8230;</p>

<p>I would assume a huge bunch of people won&#8217;t even notice a difference &#8211; after all even <span class="caps">SEO</span>moz de-classified <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/answer-these-ten-questions-before-you-charge-for-seo-services" title="even large scale">70% of</a> <span class="caps">SEO </span>companies for not knowing the <span class="caps">SEO </span>basic</p>

<p>Furthermore a couple of smaller equipped companies will struggle as they will need to do more a lot more work (as per Jim&#8217;s description) to get the same results&#8230;. and I mean &#8211; A <span class="caps">LOT MORE.</span></p>

<p>Now this moves the benefits to larger scale companies (as Google is) that DO have an intact <span class="caps">SEO </span>infrastructure for their daily <span class="caps">SEO </span>work.</p>

<p>But the small scale link builders will first have to build that infrastructure, browser plugins and knowledge to make visible what Google has just taken from the public.</p>

<h2><b>Thanks Google !</b></h2>


<p><hr /><br />
Update 2009-09-01: The Link Juice tool and a lot more is now finally available to the public in the <a href="http://www.linkresearchtools.com">Link Research Tools</a> by <span class="caps">CEMPER.COM</span><br />
<hr /></p><p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Why+Removed+Supplemental+Index+Labels+are+good+for+my+business+http://ri.ms/u2bo" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="[Post to Twitter]" border="0" /></a>&nbsp; <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business&amp;title=Why+Removed+Supplemental+Index+Labels+are+good+for+my+business" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-delicious-big4.png" alt="[Post to Delicious]" border="0" /></a>&nbsp; <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business&amp;title=Why+Removed+Supplemental+Index+Labels+are+good+for+my+business" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-reddit-big4.png" alt="[Post to Reddit]" border="0" /></a>&nbsp; <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business&amp;title=Why+Removed+Supplemental+Index+Labels+are+good+for+my+business" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-su-big4.png" alt="[Post to StumbleUpon]" border="0" /></a>&nbsp; </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
