<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Removed Supplemental Index Labels are good for my business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph C. Cemper</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph C. Cemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6541</guid>
		<description>&lt;hr&gt;
Update 2009-09-01: The Link Juice tool and a lot more is now finally available to the public in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkresearchtools.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link Research Tools&lt;/a&gt; by CEMPER.COM
&lt;hr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update 2009-09-01: The Link Juice tool and a lot more is now finally available to the public in the Link Research Tools by CEMPER.COM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Alot of people seem to be fixated on figuring out which of their pages are supplemental. Every site has a percentage of pages in the supplemental index. That&#039;s not avoidable unless you got only 10 pages and alot of PageRank.

What my tool does isn&#039;t really to &quot;detect&quot; supplemental results - site:domain.com/* or site:domain.com/&amp; does that for ya - instead, its a PageRank distribution manipulation tool. By shifting PageRank, you can practically prevent key landing pages (e.g. pages with paid links) from falling out of the main index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alot of people seem to be fixated on figuring out which of their pages are supplemental. Every site has a percentage of pages in the supplemental index. That&#8217;s not avoidable unless you got only 10 pages and alot of PageRank.</p>
<p>What my tool does isn&#8217;t really to &#8220;detect&#8221; supplemental results &#8211; site:domain.com/* or site:domain.com/&#038; does that for ya &#8211; instead, its a PageRank distribution manipulation tool. By shifting PageRank, you can practically prevent key landing pages (e.g. pages with paid links) from falling out of the main index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Hey Halfdeck!

thanks for your valuable feedback - I just tried the &amp; trick and it seems to work well - need to update my toolbars to include that count. 

I agree that your tool is not only a supplemental detector as you accidentially named it. &quot;Pagerank simulator&quot; is the name you want to give it and I enjoyed playing with it yesterday still.

It&#039;s fantastic to see how pagerank is spread across the site and in fact I already poked around with the robots.txt file of this blog to get rid of some useless pages and archives... (funny tough how the public opinion shifted from &quot;PR doesn&#039;t matter&quot; back to &quot;PR preservation&quot; is everything)

However - I enjoyed your posts on the topic (as well as that mega-resource supplemental trick page) and value your feedback

Halfdeck, what&#039;s missing in your fab tool is a live-query for the &quot;TBPR&quot; pagerank, as I think typing in the PR by hand to feed the simulator just sucks

in fact I think that by bulk-querying the PR for all pages you should even be able to detect anomalies between the &quot;should be PR&quot; and the real TBPR - aka try to detect patterns that indicate a penalty (for whatever reason)

What I would wish for that is 
a) multi-proxy support if you implement the PR query yourself

b) just an option to let the user provide a custom url to call up for getting an URLs TBPR (and let me use my own proxy infrastructure for that)

that could be something like 

http://mydomain.com/googlepr.php?url=$url$ 

so similar - get the idea?

Cheers!

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Halfdeck!</p>
<p>thanks for your valuable feedback &#8211; I just tried the &#038; trick and it seems to work well &#8211; need to update my toolbars to include that count. </p>
<p>I agree that your tool is not only a supplemental detector as you accidentially named it. &#8220;Pagerank simulator&#8221; is the name you want to give it and I enjoyed playing with it yesterday still.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fantastic to see how pagerank is spread across the site and in fact I already poked around with the robots.txt file of this blog to get rid of some useless pages and archives&#8230; (funny tough how the public opinion shifted from &#8220;PR doesn&#8217;t matter&#8221; back to &#8220;PR preservation&#8221; is everything)</p>
<p>However &#8211; I enjoyed your posts on the topic (as well as that mega-resource supplemental trick page) and value your feedback</p>
<p>Halfdeck, what&#8217;s missing in your fab tool is a live-query for the &#8220;TBPR&#8221; pagerank, as I think typing in the PR by hand to feed the simulator just sucks</p>
<p>in fact I think that by bulk-querying the PR for all pages you should even be able to detect anomalies between the &#8220;should be PR&#8221; and the real TBPR &#8211; aka try to detect patterns that indicate a penalty (for whatever reason)</p>
<p>What I would wish for that is<br />
a) multi-proxy support if you implement the PR query yourself</p>
<p>b) just an option to let the user provide a custom url to call up for getting an URLs TBPR (and let me use my own proxy infrastructure for that)</p>
<p>that could be something like </p>
<p><a href="http://mydomain.com/googlepr.php?url=$url" rel="nofollow">http://mydomain.com/googlepr.php?url=$url</a>$ </p>
<p>so similar &#8211; get the idea?</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>Christoph C. Cemper<br />
- the <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingfan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Oh and regarding my fixation on 

&gt;figuring out which of their pages are supplemental.

I&#039;m not fixated on &quot;my&quot; pages, but &quot;their&quot; pages. ALL the pages that I buy or barter a link from (it&#039;s paid anyhow - either with $, EUR or plain hard work!) should NOT suffer from being supplemental reason for whatever.

The point of my post is, that I automated Jim&#039;s &quot;Secret Supplemental Lookup Tutorial&quot; into a nice browser toolbar plugin where ALL of my link samurai team members (the &quot;Link Arbeiter&quot; can easily see that status - and focus on the creative part of link building without wasting time on this issue as maybe others will.

cheers!

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and regarding my fixation on </p>
<p>>figuring out which of their pages are supplemental.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not fixated on &#8220;my&#8221; pages, but &#8220;their&#8221; pages. ALL the pages that I buy or barter a link from (it&#8217;s paid anyhow &#8211; either with $, EUR or plain hard work!) should NOT suffer from being supplemental reason for whatever.</p>
<p>The point of my post is, that I automated Jim&#8217;s &#8220;Secret Supplemental Lookup Tutorial&#8221; into a nice browser toolbar plugin where ALL of my link samurai team members (the &#8220;Link Arbeiter&#8221; can easily see that status &#8211; and focus on the creative part of link building without wasting time on this issue as maybe others will.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
<p>Christoph C. Cemper<br />
- the <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingfan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Thanks Christoph,

Yeah, I named it &quot;supplemental results detector&quot; for SEO reasons :) The url &quot;pagerankbot&quot; tells it more like it is.

&quot;Halfdeck, what&#039;s missing in your fab tool is a live-query for the &quot;TBPR&quot; pagerank, as I think typing in the PR by hand to feed the simulator just sucks&quot;

I agree completely - it&#039;s a pain in the ass. I thought about automating that and supp detection via proxies, but I only had limited time for the project - 1 week to learn Java and 1-2 weeks to code it, so I had to make some sacrifices. Though I&#039;m out of time, I might just post the source code and let other people hack it.

The TBPR you type in doesn&#039;t get crunched by the tool. It&#039;s just a way for you to keep track of them so you can compare them with the &quot;Approximate TBPR&quot; numbers. So to me the feature wasn&#039;t all that important. I just used it to tweak the algo that translated raw PageRank numbers into TBPR. 

I remember Link Moses talking on Search Engine Land about a in-house tool that mines competitor backlinks. I agree that an SEO either needs a good team of SEOs to work with or a collection of good tools (preferably both). Even if someone pays me $400 an hour, I don&#039;t enjoy spending 10 minutes mining backlinks via Yahoo Site Explorer, which is not only slow but inaccurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Christoph,</p>
<p>Yeah, I named it &#8220;supplemental results detector&#8221; for SEO reasons <img src='http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  The url &#8220;pagerankbot&#8221; tells it more like it is.</p>
<p>&#8220;Halfdeck, what&#8217;s missing in your fab tool is a live-query for the &#8220;TBPR&#8221; pagerank, as I think typing in the PR by hand to feed the simulator just sucks&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree completely &#8211; it&#8217;s a pain in the ass. I thought about automating that and supp detection via proxies, but I only had limited time for the project &#8211; 1 week to learn Java and 1-2 weeks to code it, so I had to make some sacrifices. Though I&#8217;m out of time, I might just post the source code and let other people hack it.</p>
<p>The TBPR you type in doesn&#8217;t get crunched by the tool. It&#8217;s just a way for you to keep track of them so you can compare them with the &#8220;Approximate TBPR&#8221; numbers. So to me the feature wasn&#8217;t all that important. I just used it to tweak the algo that translated raw PageRank numbers into TBPR. </p>
<p>I remember Link Moses talking on Search Engine Land about a in-house tool that mines competitor backlinks. I agree that an SEO either needs a good team of SEOs to work with or a collection of good tools (preferably both). Even if someone pays me $400 an hour, I don&#8217;t enjoy spending 10 minutes mining backlinks via Yahoo Site Explorer, which is not only slow but inaccurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Hey Halfdeck,

having an option to configure an url that returns the PR 
would be great tough

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Halfdeck,</p>
<p>having an option to configure an url that returns the PR<br />
would be great tough</p>
<p>Christoph C. Cemper<br />
- the <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingfan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serollah</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Serollah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to thank my lucky stars that Google is making it even tougher for SEO wannabes to scam their clients .. (I was in a meeting the other day with one of those .. he did not know what &quot;anchor text&quot; was .. let alone the mystery behind the supplental index)

I&#039;m a programmer, and like Halfdeck, I enjoy hacking out techical ways to automate knowledge enhancing tidbits from Google, etc .. your sup results detector (and the suggested comments by Jim Boykin) gave me some new ideas .. thanks Christoph for this stimulating post ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to thank my lucky stars that Google is making it even tougher for SEO wannabes to scam their clients .. (I was in a meeting the other day with one of those .. he did not know what &#8220;anchor text&#8221; was .. let alone the mystery behind the supplental index)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a programmer, and like Halfdeck, I enjoy hacking out techical ways to automate knowledge enhancing tidbits from Google, etc .. your sup results detector (and the suggested comments by Jim Boykin) gave me some new ideas .. thanks Christoph for this stimulating post ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m not fixated on &quot;my&quot; pages, but &quot;their&quot; pages. ALL the pages that I buy or barter a link from (it&#039;s paid anyhow - either with $, EUR or plain hard work!) should NOT suffer from being supplemental reason for whatever.&quot;

Google clearly made it tougher for people to buy links with this change; obviously you don&#039;t want to be paying for a link on a supplemental page. From that standpoint, your plugin sounds like a sweet time-saver for your link samurais to make sure they&#039;re getting their money&#039;s worth.

&quot;having an option to configure an url that returns the PR
would be great tough&quot;

True. I wish I had the time to implement that. 2007 is whipping by too fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not fixated on &#8220;my&#8221; pages, but &#8220;their&#8221; pages. ALL the pages that I buy or barter a link from (it&#8217;s paid anyhow &#8211; either with $, EUR or plain hard work!) should NOT suffer from being supplemental reason for whatever.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google clearly made it tougher for people to buy links with this change; obviously you don&#8217;t want to be paying for a link on a supplemental page. From that standpoint, your plugin sounds like a sweet time-saver for your link samurais to make sure they&#8217;re getting their money&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>&#8220;having an option to configure an url that returns the PR<br />
would be great tough&#8221;</p>
<p>True. I wish I had the time to implement that. 2007 is whipping by too fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaii SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaii SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Hi Christoph,

You said... &quot;I automated Jim&#039;s &quot;Secret Supplemental Lookup Tutorial&quot; into a nice browser toolbar plugin&quot; 

Where can I download it? 

Thanks,
Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christoph,</p>
<p>You said&#8230; &#8220;I automated Jim&#8217;s &#8220;Secret Supplemental Lookup Tutorial&#8221; into a nice browser toolbar plugin&#8221; </p>
<p>Where can I download it? </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingfan.com/why-removed-supplemental-index-labels-are-good-my-business/comment-page-1#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-604</guid>
		<description>hi Dave,

we really have that as a toolbar feature now, and found a lot more great things to let that tool do for us but that is an internal tool only (a little competitive advantage for us :-)

best,christoph

Christoph C. Cemper
- the http://www.marketingfan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Dave,</p>
<p>we really have that as a toolbar feature now, and found a lot more great things to let that tool do for us but that is an internal tool only (a little competitive advantage for us <img src='http://www.marketingfan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>best,christoph</p>
<p>Christoph C. Cemper<br />
- the <a href="http://www.marketingfan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingfan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

